09-04-2018, 11:10 AM
(To give you some context) I watched the movie Arrival again.
The technological advancements in the last 200 years have allowed us to communicate rapidly (in real-time) with people all over the world.
Now looking towards the future, I think the next evolution will be a vast increase in the bandwidth, if you will, of our communications. We will not communicate with words but with emotions and wisdom -- stuff that can't be put into words. And it will have to be using brain-machine interfaces. That's why Elon Musk is involved in NeuraLink. It isn't just for disabled people and for interacting with appliances. It's obviously an answer to making technology ubiquitous, but bandwidth is also important: in the future, our communication must not be limited by words-per-minute (spoken or typed). Pictures speak millions of words, and video chatting is great, but I think in the future, humans will demand even higher bandwidth communication.
Imagine: you're going through a weird time with lots of stressors. You got into a college but it's a tough decision due to many factors. A doctor, therapist, or a friend asks you "how are you?" and you reply, "fine... " -- Sensing something isn't right, they ask you to WhatsApp your emotions to them. You do. Overwhelmed, they begin to cry as they feel all the stuff you're feeling, all in an instant.
Okay, none of this is a new idea. We've seen it in movies and books before.
Let's ask the fundamental questions: are we going towards a more social world or a less social world? Why do we communicate to one another in the first place? Is it for knowledge or entertainment? Will most of our communication in the future be with AI rather than other humans? Will we preserve face-to-face human communication into the future the way we preserve rituals, art, and culture?
In a future where all knowledge is at our fingertips, the smartest AI is available to answer all our questions and keep us entertained with tailor-made on-the-fly music, movies, art, games, and conversations, will we really need flesh-and-blood humans for anything?
The technological advancements in the last 200 years have allowed us to communicate rapidly (in real-time) with people all over the world.
Now looking towards the future, I think the next evolution will be a vast increase in the bandwidth, if you will, of our communications. We will not communicate with words but with emotions and wisdom -- stuff that can't be put into words. And it will have to be using brain-machine interfaces. That's why Elon Musk is involved in NeuraLink. It isn't just for disabled people and for interacting with appliances. It's obviously an answer to making technology ubiquitous, but bandwidth is also important: in the future, our communication must not be limited by words-per-minute (spoken or typed). Pictures speak millions of words, and video chatting is great, but I think in the future, humans will demand even higher bandwidth communication.
Imagine: you're going through a weird time with lots of stressors. You got into a college but it's a tough decision due to many factors. A doctor, therapist, or a friend asks you "how are you?" and you reply, "fine... " -- Sensing something isn't right, they ask you to WhatsApp your emotions to them. You do. Overwhelmed, they begin to cry as they feel all the stuff you're feeling, all in an instant.
Okay, none of this is a new idea. We've seen it in movies and books before.
Let's ask the fundamental questions: are we going towards a more social world or a less social world? Why do we communicate to one another in the first place? Is it for knowledge or entertainment? Will most of our communication in the future be with AI rather than other humans? Will we preserve face-to-face human communication into the future the way we preserve rituals, art, and culture?
In a future where all knowledge is at our fingertips, the smartest AI is available to answer all our questions and keep us entertained with tailor-made on-the-fly music, movies, art, games, and conversations, will we really need flesh-and-blood humans for anything?